Down with AI and SEO
In God we Trust

In God we Trust -not AI
The Bible, God Country Freedom

For Americans Today

Over 200 Articles and Pages Goto Sitemap or Search

WOW! SCOTUS Kicked EPA’s but for Land Grabbing.

SCOTUS BLOWS EPA out of Waters

SCOTUS found EPA outside the law Grabbing Land for many years. #wetlands

Today SCOTUS Kicked EPA’s butt for Land Grabbing

V
Nothing in the separate opinions filed by JUSTICE KAVANAUGH and JUSTICE KAGAN undermines our analysis. JUSTICE KAVANAUGH claims that we have “rewritten]” the CWA, post, at 12 (opinion concurring in judgment), and JUSTICE Kagan levels similar charges, post, at 3—4 (opinion concurring in judgment). These arguments are more than unfounded. We have analyzed the statutory language in detail, but the separate opinions pay no attention whatsoever to §1362(7), the key statutory provision that limits the CWA’s geographic reach to “the waters of the United States.” Thus, neither separate opinion even attempts to explain how the wetlands included in their interpretation fall within a fair reading of “waters.” Textualist arguments that ignore the operative text cannot be taken seriously.
VI
In sum, we hold that the CWA extends to only those “wetlands with a continuous surface connection to bodies that are ‘waters of the United States’ in their own right,” so that they are “indistinguishable” from those waters. Rapanos, 547 U. S., at 742, 755 (plurality opinion) (emphasis deleted); see supra, at 22. This holding compels reversal here. The wetlands on the Sacketts’ property are distinguishable from any possibly covered waters.

Twitter is on fire.

This a Good day to be alive.

https://twitter.com/danwillie14/status/1664348356661878792?s=20

Other sites of interest Sitemap Kari Lake more data to support Election Fraud Hold on- in Arizona Jan 29 Kari Lake Rally And Judicial Watch. Grrrgraphics.com

This is the full SCOTUS Opinion above. See how the EPA has been Grabbing land.

External Links

WOW! SCOTUS Kicked EPA’s but for Land Grabbing.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x